For example, user searches on youtube 'How to be Happy'
There will be 1000s of results:
1. How to be Happy all the time?
2. How to be Happy in life in Urdu/Hindi
3. How to be happy 24/7
4. 8 Scientific tricks to become perfectly Happy
5. How to always be Happy and Blissful
The titles are first thing users notice. Now the second thing they notice is the thumbnail.
I am sure you made a catchy title, but if your thumbnail isn't graphically accurate to what users are looking for, then they won't click on your video. As a result, your video will rank down.
As user scrolls down, they are leaving bunch of videos behind. When they click on the video, that video ranks up. This is how YouTube algorithm works. Telling this after watching 1000s of videos from successful youtubers.
How much is the ratio, or what does the YouTube algorithm define it as
We all know Mr Beast - I read somewhere that he spends $10,000 on finding the right thumbnail. If that doesn't tell the importance of it...I have a number of videos that do not perform well. When you talk about changing the thumbnail is it a good policy to change the title and re optimise the video.as well.
Just go month-to-month until you see its true potential. I went straight for the higher packages as I CANNOT believe what a value that A/B TEST alone is...(you've heard me mention that one 'ad nauseam' in comments as I can't get over it)Thank you Xavier, thatΓÇÖs so interesting. I never bothered upgrading TubeBuddy from Pro, as I felt it wasnΓÇÖt worth it. However, after hearing your results, itΓÇÖs definitely worth a rethink. Linda
100% - but you don't know what you don't know, which was my point above.I think a good thumbnail can get new viewers to click on the video! Doesn't necessarily mean the video performance will do better. You could have a great thumbnail and a bad video. You will get clicks, but over time, the views will decline because of performance.
I guess the point is this; a good thumbnail helps performance of a good video. And at the end of the day a good video will outperform a bad video. The thumbnail helps a good video get recommended more often and faster than other good videos with worse thumbnails.
Good thumbnails help a video gain the initial testing data faster; which tells youtube if the video is worth pushing. A bad video with a good thumbnail will go in the trash can faster than a bad video with a bad thumbnail.
Then on the flipside a good video with a bad thumbnail could take a while to go off. But a good video and good thumbnail is the ticket to fast growth.
We seem to be on the same page. The point I was conveying is that a thumbnail won't affect video performance. But a thumbnail can lead someone new to click on a video.100% - but you don't know what you don't know, which was my point above.
Who says that 'perfect thumbnail' you put together is any good? Just because your newest video is taking off as it's offering great value to your audience - per your point - doesn't mean the thumbnail is therefore the cause. Why not test new thumbnail variations and see if that great video of yours can do even better, just by adjusting the thumbnail to a different version?