- 2,644
- 25
- Subscriber Goal
- 250000
So over the weekend I had a pair of videos pop... no telling yet how far this is going to go but I do see some signs that these will at least be channel drivers for me. I immediately went into 'study' mode so I could determine what happened and what I could reproduce. And I am going to share with you my findings now.
Mind you... you need to have an open mind about this (as I did). This may not be what you want to hear.
There are several variables that these two videos have in common. Both were edited very carefully to ensure that they offered a quick cadence with little downtime or fluff footage. Both offer an above-average payoff (in my case I caught two very large fish) and as such the videos were given a little extra treatment when it came to filming additional b-roll and editing. I also made sure to include more lively conversation in these videos than most, an adjustment that made an immediate and noticeable impact in the video performance and watch time. One thing I did to beef this up was go back after filming and edit in additional audio commentary and effects. That sound design is paying huge dividends; I'm seeing similar results in every single video I have tried this with.
Another similarity is I feel like I have finally tuned in to a good thumbnail design and title approach. I've had problems with this historically. I can make a good thumbnail and have some pretty decent graphic design skills... but I am aware that I may lean too heavily into this rather than taking the time to craft and create a compelling thumbnail. There is a difference, and compelling beats skilled hands-down. This has proven to be the critical improvement I believe. Where improved audio techniques and improved videos reflect better performance than not improvements to my thumbnail design and titles have paid immediate, drastic dividends. I went looking back to videos that I made last year and several had very similar view durations to these two that I am currently studying but they flopped and the reason in hindsight is very apparent; my CTR sucks. Mind you, the thumbnails are excellent. In fact I have one thumbnail in particular that I worked on for a week and had enlisted the assistance of a half-dozen YouTube creators with 40,000 to over 100,000 subscribers help me with. It just didn't click with my audience or those viewers who are searching that topic. Looking back I can see similar trends across my entire channel for last year; a lot of really good thumbnails that simply were not designed to garner clicks.
Today I am focused less on the graphic design elements of my thumbnails and more on the composition of a title that causes a viewer to stop and question the topic. My thumbnails are more simplistic but feature something that grabs attention and serves to increase intrigue.
I'm not perfect by any stretch of the imagination and I still have a lot to learn. But after five years of this YouTube journey I feel like something is finally beginning to click; it feels right. More right than it has felt in several years. Now the true test; I know what to do... how long does it take to master?
Mind you... you need to have an open mind about this (as I did). This may not be what you want to hear.
There are several variables that these two videos have in common. Both were edited very carefully to ensure that they offered a quick cadence with little downtime or fluff footage. Both offer an above-average payoff (in my case I caught two very large fish) and as such the videos were given a little extra treatment when it came to filming additional b-roll and editing. I also made sure to include more lively conversation in these videos than most, an adjustment that made an immediate and noticeable impact in the video performance and watch time. One thing I did to beef this up was go back after filming and edit in additional audio commentary and effects. That sound design is paying huge dividends; I'm seeing similar results in every single video I have tried this with.
Another similarity is I feel like I have finally tuned in to a good thumbnail design and title approach. I've had problems with this historically. I can make a good thumbnail and have some pretty decent graphic design skills... but I am aware that I may lean too heavily into this rather than taking the time to craft and create a compelling thumbnail. There is a difference, and compelling beats skilled hands-down. This has proven to be the critical improvement I believe. Where improved audio techniques and improved videos reflect better performance than not improvements to my thumbnail design and titles have paid immediate, drastic dividends. I went looking back to videos that I made last year and several had very similar view durations to these two that I am currently studying but they flopped and the reason in hindsight is very apparent; my CTR sucks. Mind you, the thumbnails are excellent. In fact I have one thumbnail in particular that I worked on for a week and had enlisted the assistance of a half-dozen YouTube creators with 40,000 to over 100,000 subscribers help me with. It just didn't click with my audience or those viewers who are searching that topic. Looking back I can see similar trends across my entire channel for last year; a lot of really good thumbnails that simply were not designed to garner clicks.
Today I am focused less on the graphic design elements of my thumbnails and more on the composition of a title that causes a viewer to stop and question the topic. My thumbnails are more simplistic but feature something that grabs attention and serves to increase intrigue.
I'm not perfect by any stretch of the imagination and I still have a lot to learn. But after five years of this YouTube journey I feel like something is finally beginning to click; it feels right. More right than it has felt in several years. Now the true test; I know what to do... how long does it take to master?