Consistency comes in two forms:
When most YouTube teachers say consistency, they often speak in quantitative terms, e.g., number of times per week, month and etc. In other words you are consistently produce x number of videos per week.
The second less spoken of form of consistency is quality. In other words the higher quality video you produce the lesser quantity you'll be able to upload. In other words there's a reason why a new soap opera episode can be produced everyday, yet a space opera like
The Mandalorian takes a year just to get eight episodes.
I don't mean in any way to say that quantity is better than quality or vice versa, but it's a choice each of us needs to make.
When I first started it was pure quantity. After a long time, I realized I wanted to be like Jacques Cousteau. That meant I had to slow way down and increase the quality by a lot.
The higher your quality, the lower your quantity. The higher your quantity the lower your quality.
I am blown away by this post! So good! You are absolutely correct. People rarely discuss consistency as it relates to quality issues.
I agree that very early on, quantity of videos is a priority. I was trying to bust out 2-3 videos per week but it was killing me. I was trying to get to my 100 videos as fast as I could so I had a library to show. But yes, once you get to a certain number of videos, you begin to shift.
I've had this debate with someone about what is the higher priority in the beginning. Quantity or quality? Obviously, quantity doesn't mean you turn out slop but it also means you intentionally make choices of what is "good enough". The bar is lower in quantity. You don't edit as meticulously. You don't add B-roll, music, sound effects, text, titles, animatons, alternate shots, etc. Every element takes time. As long as it takes me already, to add every single element, would make it impossible for me to build out quickly.
Going for super high quality in the beginning will take out/kill most people. It is so freaking hard at the beginning to get started with no videos. There is so much to learn in the beginning, it is overwhelming. There is no way I would recommend people focus on quality in the beginning.
This person spent a ton of money on all kinds of expensive goodies/equipment, furnishings, insisting on 4K, a full studio setup, B-roll, etc. I felt that it would hurt him and I warned him of that. However, everyone has to learn in their own way. He started and stopped after making 5 excellent videos. Nearly every video he produced was superior to mine. But the process wore him down. He put so much into those 5 videos, he had to stop. And that is a problem he has to contend with. I think he will start again at some point but I predict he will fizzle out again unless he changes his approach because it is unsustainable unless he builds the mental muscles and internal processes to cope.
As has been said so frequently, YT is a marathon not a sprint. You can only frontload so much. That is why so many people shout, "Just turn on the camera and start recording". It is the rare bird that can do EVERYTHING well. I know I can't. I think we all play to our strengths and priorities.
I know no one is going to confuse my videos as any work of art, documentary, or any cinematic effort. However, in small ways, I do try to tweak, improve things, be more efficient with every video. Honestly, efficiency is something that I am struggling with. I have to find a way to have decent editing but not take so much darn time like I do now.
Mark Rober produces only 1 video per month but has a huge following. He proves focusing on quality is a successful strategy. I heard he intentionally keeps it once per month because he doesn't want to burn out but also has a lot of time to do prep work.
Damon, thank you again for bringing this topic to the forefront. It is not discussed very much at all. I watched a few of your videos and it carries gravitas and it sets a mood. Your videos are to be relished and savored. I may try some of what you do in a future video.